The honest comparison

Trackers tell you where you show up. Stratridge tells you why you don’t.

If you're evaluating AI visibility tools, the trackers below are good instruments — several teams should own one. The question they don't answer is the one your number depends on: why the engines answer without you, and what exactly to ship about it. That's the job Stratridge was built for.

Vendor by vendor

What each does well — and where the job ends.

Public pricing and positioning as of July 2026, from each vendor's own pages and public review listings. All trademarks belong to their owners.

Profound

Enterprise pricing (talk to sales)

The enterprise leader in AI answer analytics.

Genuinely good at: Deep answer-data coverage across roughly ten engines, enterprise controls (SOC 2, SSO), and agent analytics. If you're a large brand that needs measurement depth at scale, Profound is the reference point.

Where the job ends: Enterprise contracts and enterprise budgets. The output is analytics — what the engines say, at volume. Deciding why your message loses and what to publish next stays your team's job.

Peec AI

From about €85/mo

Mid-market AI visibility analytics.

Genuinely good at: Fast time-to-dashboard and clean competitor-benchmarked share-of-voice trendlines, at a mid-market price. A strong pick for a team that wants the score on a chart this week.

Where the job ends: The chart tells you where you stand against rivals. It doesn't read your positioning, your pages, or your proof layer to tell you why the engines pick them — or hand you the artifacts that change it.

Otterly.AI

From $29/mo

Entry-level AI search monitoring.

Genuinely good at: The most affordable way to start tracking citations and links across AI search — a favorite among small businesses for exactly that reason.

Where the job ends: Monitoring at this price is a meter, not a mechanic. When the meter reads low, the diagnosis and the fixes are a separate project with separate tools.

Searchable

From $124.99/mo

AI SEO tracking plus content generation.

Genuinely good at: Tracks visibility across the major engines and generates AEO articles in one platform, with GA4 and Search Console correlation. A sensible bundle for content-led teams.

Where the job ends: Its own reviews note there's no in-platform execution — findings and articles still land in your CMS by hand — and the diagnosis stays channel-level. Whether your homepage, your category label, or your proof layer is the real leak isn't its question.

The difference

A meter tells you the reading. You need the reading to change.

Stratridge runs the tracker's daily measurement and everything downstream of it: a six-dimension, twenty-four-factor diagnosis of why your message loses — positioning, messaging, discoverability, reputation, distribution, narrative drift — with the evidence quoted from your own pages. Then the fixes, generated ready to ship: llms.txt, structured data, page rewrites, a brief for every query the engines answer without you. Then the part no tracker offers: every shipped fix is re-checked by the next audit and pinned on your citation trendline, so movement reads against what you did.

One number for scale: Stratridge starts at $125/mo with a free 7-day trial that includes the full diagnosis and the AI Visibility Kit — so you can compare the depth of the read against any tracker's dashboard before spending anything.
Fair questions

Asked by teams mid-evaluation.

Do I need a tracker AND Stratridge?

Usually not. Stratridge probes the engines daily and charts your citation share with your shipped fixes pinned on the line — the tracker's core job is built in. Teams already on an enterprise tracker keep it for measurement depth and use Stratridge for the diagnosis and the fixes.

Is this comparison fair?

It aims to be. Every entry leads with what the tool is genuinely good at, and every factual claim comes from the vendor's own public pages or public review listings as of July 2026. If something here is out of date, tell us and we'll fix it.

What does Stratridge actually do differently?

Three things: the diagnosis spans your whole marketing message (six dimensions, twenty-four factors — positioning and proof, not just presence), the output is fixes ready to ship (llms.txt, structured data, page rewrites, citation-gap briefs), and every shipped fix is re-checked by the next audit so movement reads against what you did.

Vendor names, prices, and capabilities reflect public information as of July 2026 and may have changed. Corrections: contact us.

The audit is the fastest way
to find out.

Connect a URL. Get the full read on how your market sees you — free. Then decide whether the story they're finding is the one you meant to tell.